The Times We Live In

Often, the people who consider themselves non-political, or who choose to remain silent during times of oppression, are the ones who actually understand the state of the world the most. Yet, they choose to stay blind to the idea of unity. 2026 has been one of the most distraught years to witness and experience. We have been exposed to the reality of the systems imposed on humanity by those who created them, and to what it took to reach this extent of control.

For a long time, humanity has been trying to tell the truth to society. However, those responsible for wrongdoing held the power of media influence and psychological dominance. They frequently abused power and religion to justify their inhumane behavior. In response, they labeled those who exposed them as liberals, communists, socialists, far-left radicals, Democrats, conspiracy theorists, skeptics, the list goes on.

These labels create an energetic and social field where, once assigned, people are treated according to the label rather than the individual. They are called radical, dismissed, and stripped of credibility. Entire life experiences are reshaped based on labels imposed upon them. Many who attempted to expose the truth faced threats, blackmail, and, in extreme cases, trafficking or staged deaths publicly announced as something else. The individuals who constructed and maintain this system have the power to do so.

Those who attempted to protect society from cult-like, ritual-driven social elites have often been framed under these labels or worse. They are shunned by society, and when that is not enough, they are erased, reported to have died by suicide, drug overdose, or a “sudden” car crash.

There are now too many people aware of these atrocities for them to remain completely hidden. In some ways, it is becoming harder for billionaires, multimillionaires, and elite entrepreneurs to escape accountability for dehumanizing actions. In many cases, they are the root of war and manufactured division. They must be held accountable so the world can witness that good will always strive to overcome evil.

Yet those who perpetuate harm often hold the most power: economically, socially, and religiously. They manipulate narratives to normalize violence, exploitation, and moral decay, or destabilize societies altogether through economic and social pressure. These individuals do not see people as humans experiencing life with emotion, conscience, and soul. They were conditioned to desensitize themselves, to see the human body as a number or commodity rather than a vessel of consciousness, dignity, and meaning.

Monsters are not born, they are created. They emerge from unresolved wounds, systems of indoctrination, and cycles that were never healed. Many individuals responsible for widespread harm operate under the belief that they can cause infinite suffering and later be forgiven by God at judgment. Yet, I choose to believe that true judgment requires experiencing every pain inflicted upon others, a belief I hold for my own sense of justice and peace.

I believe in forgiveness and understanding, but it becomes nearly impossible when faced with individuals whose existence is rooted in deliberate harm. Many of the figures we believe to be at the top, those who appear on our daily screens, are not truly the ones in control. Figures such as Donald Trump, Benjamin Netanyahu, and Jeffrey Epstein are often perceived as powerful, yet they may function more as visible intermediaries than ultimate authorities.

This raises deeper questions. Who operates behind them? Who influences the influencers? Some point toward legacy power structure families, financial institutions, and cultural gatekeepers, such as the Rockefeller family, BlackRock, or entertainment-finance hybrids like Roc Nation. Many of these forces operate far from public visibility, absent from mainstream records and media narratives.

So we are left with the central question: Who truly sits at the top of the chain? Who holds power without being seen, named, or scrutinized?

These are no longer merely conspiracy theories. They are emerging social-science hypotheses that demand serious, ethical investigation, not dismissal. Seeking truth should never be considered radical.